Articulation
My argument:
I want to argue that we should not always believe the information which is wandering about the Internet. We can easily get lots of information through the Internet and we tends to belive it without any doubt. But we have to raise the critical attitude when we get it through the information.
How I found my argument :
My first research question was, how confusing information gets generated and affects people? As I continued researching, I realized that there are lots of confusing information on the Internet. So I felt the necessity of critical attitude. Eventually I thought that we should not always believe the information which is wandering about the Internet.
New research questions :
I have several questions that need to be resolved.
a)What is the more reliable way to get the information?
b)What is the problem of beliving the information from the internet without doubt?
c)How many people prefer to use the Internet to get the information?
I'll conI'll continue browsing the internet and looking for interesting articles and keeping track of my research with blog posts.
New research questions :
I have several questions that need to be resolved.
a)What is the more reliable way to get the information?
b)What is the problem of beliving the information from the internet without doubt?
c)How many people prefer to use the Internet to get the information?
I'll conI'll continue browsing the internet and looking for interesting articles and keeping track of my research with blog posts.
Connections to the Harvard Sampler :
This argument has many connections to the Harvard Sampler. First, it is obviously directly related to the Internet section, especially information and power. Second it connects to 'Is Magarine or Butter Worse for Your Health? How confusing Scientific Evidence Gets Generated' because both are talking about the damage of confusing information.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기